Personality Psychology Myer Bringgs Personality

I have recently became interested in personality psychology which states that we all have permanente and defined traits. Our personality â€Å"type† is also classified and determined and associated with certain personality traits. Upon exploring Myer Bringgs personality information, I find it interesting to realize that everyone can be classified into sixteen categories. As you explore this information, you find that you can ‘fit’ into a few different ‘types’, but you fit best into one specifically. A personality type also tells you a lot about what type of person you are, what careers you might be interested in, and what you will more than likely in certain future situations (such as relationships with your spouse and child). Knowing about†¦show more content†¦Even adults and the elderly are continuing to change. I find it intriguing to learn that we are all different, but there are somethings that are the same in everyone as they age. We be come interested in similar things and we lose interests in many of the same things. I think that looking at the similarities and differences of peoples and their interests help prove the fact that everyone is different, but it also helps to establish unity between certain people, groups, and all of humanity. 2. The four main ideas discussed in the textbook and this course is critical thinking, the two-track mind, exploring human strength (exploring the positives of human nature) and biopsychosocial (sometimes referred to the biopsychosocial spiritual approach). When someone thinks critically, they ask â€Å"why† and â€Å"how† questions. This approach is useful in the attempt to avoid bias and base conclusions off of false or unproven statements. If I were to tell you that it is the man’s sperm that determines the gender of the child, you should think critically and ask â€Å"Why is this the case?†, â€Å"What evidence do you have to support this claim?† and â€Å"Has this statement been proven?† Thinking critically enhances your knowledge and verifies that the information you have been given is correct. The double-mind aspect of psychology is the fact that we are acting on our subconscious more than we are acting on our own will. Although you ma y feel like you are in control of your actions, most of you

Tear Down this Wall Speech - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 854 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/05/08 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Berlin Wall Essay Did you like this example? Ronald Reagans speech, Tear Down this Wall was a very important speech that served to unify the east and west Berlins. His speech was made to break down the Berlin wall, which he believed was unnecessary and questioned it from the moment he saw it. He gave his speech in 1987 and he talked about how he believes the wall is not only a symbol against german freedom but freedom of mankind, he also talks about the history of the presidents that came before him and the history of Berlin and Germany. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Tear Down this Wall Speech" essay for you Create order Lastly he talks about how he will work with France and Britain to make change for Berlin. The Tear down this wall speech also known as, The speech at the Berlin wall was an extremely important speech as said by Former West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl,He was a stroke of luck for the world, especially for Europe.1. He gave the speech on June 12, 1987 to the people of Berlin although most of them couldnt hear due to the eastern german police blocking the citizens from getting close to the wall, his main topic during the speech was how he wanted the destruction the Berlin Wall due to it being the means of division between Berlin and Europe. The ethos in this speech comes from the fact that he is the president of the United States and the people he mentions that are on his side that he works with or will work with. So that he can make an effective and unbiased statement President Reagan acknowledges Khrushchevs statement stating,We will bury you2. This shows Reagans credibility to be able to make a speech for good with also incorporating people who are against him. Later i n the speech he also mentions how the soviets have been leaning more towards changing their current political society, but mentioning them he successfully talks about the other political influences in Germany, this validates his argument by showing the two sides of the argument. Reagan uses logos to help his main point that freedom, democracy, and the destruction of the Berlin Wall are all beneficial. During his speech Reagan talks about how other countries are prospering due to their freedom, and he shows how each country that has achieved freedom has grown exponentially economically. In his speech it is evident that Reagan is trying to give facts and trying to persuade the people that freedom is essential to gaining more power and money for every country. By saying this Reagan is trying to gain credibility by saying how he wants change just as much as the berlins do. Later in the speech Reagan still keeps on giving examples of freedom giving happiness to really put that idea in their heads and to strengthen his credibility. Throughout the speech Reagan sticks to the belief that people want to live in stable countries with a strong economy, he is using this as a bas to appeal to peoples logic and create an effective claim to persuade the people to see his s ide of the story. In addition to his logical and ethical appeals Reagan also makes several appeals to pathos. Although they dont stand out as much as his logic and ethos, Reagans thoughts emotional and moral problems do work well with his rhetoric. Reagan starts off by familiarizing his audience with his surroundings and getting a connection with his audience, Were drawn here by the feeling of history in this city, more than 500 years older than our own nation3. In this Reagan praises Berlins history while also showing berlins seniority in age. Reagan uses the berlin wall as a means to make the speech more personalized and relevant. With the context structured, Reagan then moves on to his audience. He establishes a connection with the Berliners by showing that he understands their situation. The empathy shown in Reagans speech goes well with his Ethos and shows the Germans that he is fit to represent their hardships. Overall Reagans argument is very strong and effective. Although it is still unknown whether or not the speech had an actual impact on the decision to break down the wall there was still a very strong acceptance of what he said. It is evident that his real purpose was to gather the people of germany and make them one strong force. Reagans goal was a success due to his great combination of ethical, emotional and logical arguments. He was able to connect with his audience by using these claims and used his presidential status to give a more authoritative approach. Even though Reagans speech was a success he did not use all of the resources he could have used to sound more professional like statistics. Reagan uses examples on economy a lot but never gives any statistical evidence on any of the examples which made his speech weaker. Although Reagan had many weak spots in his speech his overall speech was strong and was able to take the point across, it is proven by the fact that the berli n wall was eventually torn down giving them the freedom they had been fighting for.

Fathers and Sons in Hamlet Essay - 1189 Words

Fathers and Sons in Hamlet Hamlets father, Old King Hamlet who he looked up to was recently killed, and his mother married his uncle within a month. He receives a visit from the ghost of his father which urges him to revenge [Claudius] foul and most unnatural murder (I, v, 32) of Old Hamlet. It is only logical that under these circumstances, Hamlet would be under great duress, and it would not be abnormal for him to express grief. Fortnibra and Laertes also have to deal with the avenging their fathers death. Fortinbras and Laertes are parallel characters to Hamlet, and they provide critical points on which to compare the actions and emotions of Hamlet throughout the play. They are also important in Hamlet,†¦show more content†¦Hamlet, is very private with his grief. His mourning for King Hamlet is long and drawn out, two months after his fathers death, he is still observed to be wearing ...suits of solemn black.(I, ii, 82). Hamlet suspects nothing of his fathers murder until the ghost of Old King Hamlet speaks to him. Laertes, however, response to the death of his father is immediate. He is suspicious about the death of his father, as is evident in his speech to Claudius. How came he dead? Ill not be juggled with. To hell, allegiance!(IV, v, 149-150). Laertes is a mirror to Hamlet. Hamlet is a scholar at Wittenberg, and Laertes at France. Both are admired for their swordsmanship. Both men loved and respected their fathers, and displayed some dishonesty when plotting to avenge their fathers deaths. The relationship is between Polonius and Laertes, is the ultimate bond. It is a bond, which contains the necessary love and respect in a father-son relationship, but yet it lacks the closeness, or real emotional bonding required in a true relationship. Polonius as a father loves Laertes and listens to him and councils him on different topics. He is proud of his son and his intelligence, yet he does not altogether trust this intelligence enough to let him use his own discretion in France. In the first scene of Act Two, we see PoloniusShow MoreRelatedFather And Son Relationships In Hamlet By William Shakespeare1249 Words   |  5 PagesThe Bond Between Father and Son William Shakespeare is a one of the most successful writers, due to his creativity and complex plots. He is well known for focusing several of his his plays around the theme of revenge, but each of the works accomplishes this in a different ways. His most popular vengeful play would be Hamlet, which focuses more of the anticipation and the moral aspect of revenge, rather than the act itself. Hamlet was written around 1601 and set in Denmark during the late middleRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Hamlet - Father And Son Relationship Essay1373 Words   |  6 PagesFather and Son Relationship in Hamlet Children born into a fatherless family in America are more likely to have behavioral problems, more likely to go to prison, and more likely to commit a violent crime. While Hamlet did not exactly live in contemporary America-or lose his father until his late 20s- he exemplifies these statistics quite well in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Hamlet is mercurial, would certainly be locked up if he wasn’t royal, and eventually commits multiple (justified) killings. All ofRead MoreHamlet Essay, Loyalty Between Father and Son Relationships1297 Words   |  6 PagesLoyalty between Father and Son Relationships â€Å"O cursed spite,/ That ever I was born to set it right!† (Hamlet 1.5.197-198). These words of Hamlet set the tone for the theme of revenge in the play Hamlet. This reoccurring theme arises through the father and son relationships in the course of the play. The characters Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras all experience the loss of their fathers, and all, as loyal sons, must avenge them. In each case, the execution of their plans is different, andRead MoreResponse to Shakespeares Presentation of the Responsibilities and Obligations Placed on Sons by Fathers in Hamlet1394 Words   |  6 PagesPlaced on Sons by Fathers in Hamlet Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, is a play based on the theme of revenge (otherwise known as a revenge tragedy). However there are other themes to this play that may not be as obvious as the main. Love, hate, madness are all other themes to this play, along with the theme of responsibility to sons and fathers. This theme is sustained throughout the whole play when, at the climax, the responsibility of avenging his dead father is finallyRead MoreShakespeare s Hamlet : A Close Look At A Son s Relationship With His Father1885 Words   |  8 PagesShakespeare’s Hamlet provides a close look at a son’s relationship with his parents, particularly the way a man’s bond with his mother changes after his father dies. Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, is haunted by the violence of his father’s death and the unthinking way in which his mother chooses to wed her dead husband’s brother, the new King Claudius. From his first conversation with the ghost of his father, Hamlet learns that Claudius murdered his father and he grapples with the consequences ofRead MoreHamlet : Claudius And Hamlet1008 Words   |  5 PagesPaternal-Parental-Uncle-Father-Figure-Claudius and Adopted-Nephew-Cousin-Son-Hamlet A parental figure and son conflict in Hamlet is Claudius and Hamlet. In Hamlet’s dysfunctional family Claudius has taken the place of Hamlet’s father after killing his brother the king. Hamlet refuses to acknowledge Claudius as his father because Claudius took the place of his father a month after his dad died . Another source to the conflict is that Claudius killed Hamlet’s father. After Hamlet found out about hisRead MoreHamlet As The Tragic Hero Of The Play Hamlet 1314 Words   |  6 PagesIn order to better understand Hamlet one must first asses, and define man. According to webster dictionary a man is a male often having the qualities associated with bravery,script or toughness(site webster dictionary www.define a man.com here). We know the male figure is known to exhibit distinctive male traits such as strength, dignity, courage and be a provider and supporter. As seen in Hamlet one must understand the male figure to better understand Hamlet and why th e male behave in such waysRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Hamlet - Bloody Uncle : Binary, Differance, And Privilege1254 Words   |  6 PagesPrivilege in Shakespeare’s Hamlet There is the idea in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, that Hamlet is still and will forever be mourning his father’s murder. No matter how hard Claudius tries, he will not be able to fill the role of Hamlet’s father due to the fact that he murdered Hamlet’s father and immediately married his mother. Claudius can consider himself the â€Å"loving father† as much as he wants, however, it is in the theme of the play for him to be the opposite toward his nephew/son (ACT IV scene iii). TheRead More Revenge in Shakespeares Hamlet Essay1421 Words   |  6 PagesRevenge in Shakespeares Hamlet In Hamlet, Shakespeare uses revenge as a major theme present throughout the work. Revenge plays a crucial role in the development of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, and Laertes, son of Polonius. All three men seek revenge for the murder of their fathers. Revenge can be interpreted as a separate character in Hamlet. Revenge is set to overcome anyone who seeks it. Initially, after each of the murders, every son had a definite course of actionRead MoreRevenge in Shakespeare ´s Play Hamlet Essay690 Words   |  3 PagesHamlet and Laertes both contribute to the play main theme, revenge. Both characters dearly loved their fathers, thats the reason for revenge. But, their love has been distorted and all they feel now is a need for revenge for their fathers’ deaths. But they cope with it differently. Hamlet knows who killed his father, but does not take immediate action. Laertes is a little unclear on who is responsible for his fathers death, but he takes i mmediate action to avenge him. To hell, allegiance! vows,

Ambassadors Painting Essay Example For Students

Ambassadors Painting Essay The Ambassador painting by Hans Holstein is a very popular painting from its time, the Renaissance. This time period is shown by a certain symbol that Hans liked to use in his paintings, the skull. He would place it at the bottom Of his paintings as a symbol that this art ivory is his. The skull is painted in anamorphic perspective, Which is 3 style in the Renaissance period. They say this painting could have up to three meanings. Heavens, Living world, and Death (Holiness skull). Examiners Of the painting believe it could have been made, With intention to be placed on a stairwell. This would allow the person walking up the stairs to be startled by the skull in the picture. The items placed in the painting are also indeed highly symbolic, each with their own tale. The picture places two men in the center, which is thought to be seen as symbolic. The man on the right has clerical dressing while the man on the left is in secular attire. It is also thought by some that the objects, such as the open books and symbols tot religious knowledge, and Virgin symbolism, link to the unification of capitalism and the church. Others believe that these objects can mean different. Some suggest religious strife at that time. The men in the picture, Jean De Danville (owner of land) and Georges De Selves (Bishop) show a conflict between religious and secular authorities. The lute in the picture is shown with a broken string; this is commonly believed to be a symbol of discord or tension between clergy and scholars. In the picture is also a globe showing the map of the world. Its thought to hue been created in 1530 but of unknown origin. They call it the Ambassadors globe due to its part in this painting. More simple viewed items in the painting are obvious in meaning. It includes globes, quadrant, sundial, and a tourniquet. These items are to show exploration interests of the men in the painting. Also the Oriental rug pictured shows perhaps things gained while on these travels. These rugs are somewhat typically shown in some Renaissance paintings. In conclusion, the Hans Holstein painting is a very simple painting to some, but after further looks can show many hidden messages for the viewer. From skulls portraying death to other symbolic hints to religion and strife, this painting has a lot to otter to the viewer.